The RBI issued final guidelines to the entities operating electronic trading platforms (ETPs). As per the norms issued by the central bank, ETPs constitute any electronic system, other than a recognised stock exchange, on which transactions will be carried out for eligible instruments. The final direction was published on 5 October 18 based on the public consultation feedback on the draft ETP direction released almost a year back.
Trading on electronic platforms is being encouraged across the world as it enhances pricing transparency, processing efficiency and risk control. It also enables better market surveillance and, therefore, discourages market abuse and unfair trading practices.
An exception to these directions would be in cases where ETPs are operated by banks for their customers (who are acting as users) on a bilateral basis. This exception would only be applicable when the ETPs do not extend direct or indirect access to market makers in any markets for eligible instruments (including purposes such as foreign exchange transactions, authorised dealers).
While the RBI directive lists down essential criteria for bringing about key governance and controls into the system, a comparison with the regulations put forth by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) shows some key aspects that the RBI can further consider:
With ETPs being encouraged across the world with a focus on enhancing pricing transparency, processing efficiency and risk control, the directives issued by the RBI should incorporate the above in due course, as collectively, they will be a key determinant in bringing about better market surveillance and in discouraging market abuse and unfair trading practices.
The complete discussion paper on the Electronic Trading Platforms (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2018, can be accessed here.
The RBI, through its official notification on 25 October 2018, has issued the directions on Fit and Proper Criteria for sponsors of registered Asset Reconstruction Companies (ARCs).
The notification details the following aspects of eligibility:
The RBI has released indicative guidelines on the basic cyber security framework to be implemented by all UCBs, given the importance of enhanced security from cyberthreats by improving the current defences in addressing cyber risks.
The framework discusses the following key points:
The RBI, through its official notification on 16 October 2018, released the operational guidelines and requirements on interoperability of PPIs, viz. mobile wallets, etc., through:
The notification highlights the common requirements in addition to separate requirements for UPI and card networks.
Dr. Viral V Acharya, Deputy Governor of the RBI, delivered a speech highlighting the importance of independent regulatory institutions as the A. D. Shroff Memorial Lecture.
The speech highlighted the independence of the central bank on the following points:
In the RBI bulletin dated 11 October 2018, the RBI Governor discussed the conceptual framework that helps in understanding the various aspects of vigilance.
He also highlighted how preventive vigilance is crucial in government or public sector institutions and can act as a tool of good governance while punitive vigilance seeks to deter the occurrence of a lapse.
The governor further discussed the vigilance function and several measures at the RBI, concluding that simplifying rules and procedures and leveraging technology can strengthen the preventive vigilance framework, thereby ensuring compliance.
SEBI has issued guidelines for allowing foreign participants to hedge their commodity exposure in the light of feedback received from the market participants against the consultation paper dated 18 May 2018.
As per the guidelines, foreign entities having actual exposure to Indian commodity markets are allowed to participate in the commodity derivative segment of recognised stock exchanges for hedging their exposure. Such foreign entities shall be known as EFEs.
Details of the regulatory framework for participation by EFEs can be viewed here.
On 30 October 2018, SEBI issued an advisory against firms which are using online web portals to trade in a variety of financial products, including various types of derivatives traded on overseas platforms/exchanges.
SEBI further stated that such firms are not supervised by any regulatory body in India and that the inherent complexities of the products offered by such firms can result in losses to investors.
Investors are thus cautioned to avoid participating in such unregulated web portals/entities offering transactions in securities (including derivatives) which are executed or undertaken on the terminal of foreign exchanges/platforms.
SEBI has directed all exchanges and clearing corporations to follow the norms given below to bring uniformity in the procedures for obtaining samples for the purpose of assaying:
The provisions of this circular shall come into effect from 16 October 2018.
In a much-anticipated development, the Financial Stability Oversight Council announced on 17 October that it has voted unanimously to rescind the designation of Prudential Financial, Inc., as a SIFI, meaning that it is no longer subject to Federal Reserve supervision.
Of the four major non-bank firms originally tagged with the label by the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC), Prudential was the last remaining non-bank with the SIFI designation. The council was established under Dodd-Frank and charged with broad authorities to identify and monitor excessive risks to the US financial system – but the law allows designated firms to have their status reviewed for de-designation.
‘The Council’s decision today follows extensive engagement with the company and a detailed analysis showing that there is not a significant risk that the company could pose a threat to financial stability,’ said Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, who chairs the FSOC, pursuant to Dodd-Frank.
Citibank paid a $38.7 million fine for improper handling of ‘pre-released’ ADRs, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced this week.
ADRs are U.S. securities that represent shares of a foreign company. To be held in custody at a depositary bank, ADRs must have a certain number of foreign shares.
However, many banks engage in the practice of pre-releasing ADRs, which enables ADRs to be issued without the deposit of foreign shares as long as there is an agreement that the foreign shares correspond to the number of shares the ADR represents.
ESMA has published the total number and total volume of trades executed in the EU over the period of April–September ’18 for 17,999 equity and equity-like instruments and for 387,212 bonds. A market participant can now use this data to calculate if it is obligated to be an SI by comparing the trading it undertook in its own account compared to the total number and volume of trade in the EU.
For derivatives and other instruments, the announced date for data publication is 1 Feb 2019.
ESMA has issued a statement relating to the issues that certain financial and non-financial counterparties (NFC) which are above the clearing threshold will face on 21 Dec 2018 in starting a central counterparty clearing house (CCP) to clear their derivative contracts and trade them on trading venues.
ESMA expects that for the group entities that benefit from the derogation for intra-group transactions and NFCs that are not above the clearing threshold (as prescribed under the current EMIR legislation) in the interest rate derivative asset class, the competent authorities will generally apply their risk-based supervisory powers in their daily administration of applicable legislation in a proportionate manner.