July 2018
With the growth of digital payments in the country, there has been a significant increase in the data generated through payment transactions. Increasingly, there are new players and participants in the payments ecosystem offering unique use-cases and novel payment solutions to customers in India. In light of such ubiquitous data there has been an imminent need for enhanced supervision by authorities and for safeguarding access and storage of data, especially, given that many global players have their databases and processing systems in locations across the world. Consequently, in a bid to have unfettered supervisory access to data stored with system providers, the Reserve Bank of India issued a circular on 6 April’18 on “Storage of Payment System data”. This circular mandated the storage of entire data related to payment systems operated by system providers, in a system only in India.
The RBI directive has far reaching implications as the mandate not only impacts authorized payment systems, but also several other players in the payments value chain such as service providers, intermediaries, third party vendors.
One of the key points raised by impacted players is that the mandate is for storage of entire payments related data only in India. This essentially prohibits players from sharing any data to their centralized servers for fraud monitoring, or for serving as back-up repository. The circular also states that the requisite data should include end-to-end transaction details/ information collected/ carried/ processed as part of the message/ payment instruction. This widens the horizon of the data in consideration and creates ambiguity on whether such data includes only transaction information or data related to customer identification as well.
RBI has also mandated all payments system providers to submit a System Audit Report on completion of the exercise and is subsequently seeking fortnightly updates about progress on the implementation of the mandate. However, it is unclear if a separate bench at the Apex body will monitor these.
While the initial circular was brief and multiple interpretations were doing rounds, it is expected that the RBI will soon publish a detailed Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) document for further clarifications.
Most Indian Banks and PPI players are already in compliance with requirements stated in this circular, however players such as foreign banks international card networks, new age FinTechs using on-cloud services that are hosted internationally, payment intermediaries involved in processing and authentication need to take immediate action to comply.
While the mandate will benefit Indian hosted data center providers, it may also act as an entry barrier for future players looking to enter the Indian payments ecosystem.
Considering the objectives with which the RBI has setup this mandate and is seeking regular updates from impacted stakeholders, it would be prudent for banks and payments service providers to devise their strategy and take immediate action to ensure compliance to the circular. Listed below are options that may be considered-
This would entail setting up both IT components viz. servers, storage, networking devices and Non-IT components viz. cabling, cooling, batteries, power backup, security. While one’s own data center provides complete ownership and control, deploying a new data center is expensive and time consuming as it entails numerous activities such as finding the right location, hiring IT and non-IT vendors, deploying resources to build and maintain it, deploying offsite DR system, certifications such as PCI DSS/ PA-DSS, security audits as applicable. Setting up such a data center for a large player can take anywhere between 12- 18 months and end up becoming one of the large projects a company undertakes.
Hosting in a co-located managed data center can enable flexibility, scalability, ensure costs get allocated over a longer time while ensuring high availability and efficiency. As long as there is strategic long term benefit and an appetite for such investments, buying out an existing hosted data center business may also be considered for achieving quick turnaround and compliance.
Private cloud hosting with ring-fenced resources can be considered as a quick, secure and flexible solution. This is subject to the underlying network of physical servers being hosted locally (as the circular has ‘only’ clause). This may also prove to be cost effective for players having spikes in demand utilization.
There are alternatives available to building and expanding one’s data center, areas like business needs, capital costs, growth expectations, data security and staffing requirements need to be explored. A phase wise migration for primary and then DR to on-soil systems may be an alternative that results in higher compliance in adhering to the timelines.
The Reserve Bank of India is requiring that payment system ... The RBI mandate for domestic storage of all data must be met by October 15
RBI’s move on data localization to payment systems comes as a probable aftermath of the recent data breach that has allegedly impacted elections in US and India.
Payment data All payment system operators will have to ensure that data related to payments is stored only in India.
The operators have been asked to comply with the instructions within six months, the central bank said in a notification. RBI noted that “not all system providers” store the payments data in India.
India is aiming towards being a paperless economy. For the past one year, digitization has taken India by storm.
Considering the current trend in data storage technology, data is usually kept in multiple locations in order to have back up for data centers.